Former Welsh MP Craig Williams Has Found Himself in a High-Profile Court Case for Gambling on General Elections
Facing serious charges relating to betting on the 2024 UK General Elections, Former Conservative MP Craig Williams has had to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court. The Gambling Commission alleges that the former Welsh MP cheated by placing a £100 bet on a July election date, which he had made days before Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s official announcement. Due to these allegations, Williams has been charged with one count of cheating at gambling under Section 42 of the Gambling Act 2005 and three counts of assisting or enabling others to cheat.
What Betting is Allowed and Prohibited in Wales?
Gambling is governed by the Gambling Act 2005 in Wales and is overseen by the UK Gambling Commission. The law allows many types of betting activities. These include lottery games, sports betting, bingo, arcades, and remote gambling, such as online casinos. That being said, the law prohibits gambling when dishonest practices could be involved. For example, betting based on insider information is illegal. This means that knowing when an election will be called before it’s public, and placing a bet on this outcome would be considered a criminal offence. When an individual breaks these rules, they could be convicted for up to two years in prison.
With this in mind, those who don’t have access to insider information but want to place bets like to do so through remote gambling options. Online casinos are one example of these options which are legal in Wales. According to Viola D’Elia, many players choose these platforms because of the convenience, wider choice of games, and faster payouts. Compared to traditional betting shops, these platforms are well-liked because they offer more flexibility and player control. With many sites available, it can be hard to find reliable options, which is why resources like a comprehensive guide explain how to find some of the best payout casinos that offer better odds and faster withdrawals.
How He Enabled Others to Cheat
Standing alongside 14 others implicated in the scandal, Williams is accused of leveraging privileged information from within Conservative Party circles or Downing Street to profit from betting markets. Known as Operation Scott, the Gambling Commission’s probe found that numerous bets were placed before Sunak surprised the country by setting the election date of 4 July 2024.
Not the Act of Betting That Has Williams in Trouble
People are free to place bets on everything from sports and horse racing to political outcomes in Wales. The only catch is it needs to be done through licensed operators and without access to privileged information. Betting on when an election might happen isn’t illegal by itself. In fact, political betting has grown in popularity, with many punters staking money on leadership contests or voting outcomes.
The issue comes when someone places a bet with an unfair advantage. If a person uses inside knowledge, it no longer qualifies as ordinary gambling. This information could include unreleased government plans or private discussions about key dates. Betting becomes a criminal act under the Gambling Act 2005 when this information is used. That’s what Operation Scott is investigating: Not the act of betting, but how that betting was informed. The law is specific here. Gambling must be based on publicly available information. If it’s not, the bet is considered to have been rigged, and those involved can face prosecution.
Court Appearances and Pleas Entered
At the Westminster Magistrates’ Court hearing on 13 June 2025, Williams did not enter a plea. Among the 14 co-defendants, 12 have pleaded not guilty, including former Senedd member Russell George and Welsh Conservatives’ director Thomas James. Others charged include ex‑police officer Jeremy Hunt and campaign director Anthony Lee.
Potential Consequences for the Accused
The individuals charged in connection with Operation Scott face prosecution under Section 42 of the Gambling Act 2005. This section defines cheating as any act that interferes with the fairness or integrity of a betting event, which includes the use of insider information. The offence can apply whether or not the person actually wins money from the bet. It focuses on the act of gaining an unfair advantage, not just the outcome.
If found guilty, defendants could face up to two years in prison, an unlimited fine, or both. The case started at Westminster Magistrates’ Court, which is typical for preliminary hearings. However, due to the seriousness of the allegations and the potential sentences, it has now been referred to Southwark Crown Court. Crown courts handle more serious criminal cases, and judges there can impose harsher penalties. The referral also allows for a jury trial, which is expected in this case.
What This Means for Political Betting
This case has cast a spotlight on political gambling. While betting on events like a party leader standing down or election outcomes is commonplace and legal, wagering based on insider knowledge breaches legal boundaries. The Gambling Commission and even the Metropolitan Police have emphasised that this investigation is specifically about using non‑public information rather than ordinary betting.
Impact on Williams’ Career and Reputation
Craig Williams built a steady political career over nearly a decade. He was first elected as MP for Cardiff North in 2015, though he lost the seat just two years later to Labour’s Anna McMorrin. In 2019, he returned to Westminster as the Conservative MP for Montgomeryshire and soon became a close ally of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, serving as one of his parliamentary private secretaries. That role placed him near the heart of Downing Street, offering access to top-level discussions and strategic planning.
The trial’s outcome could carry heavy personal consequences beyond any possible sentence. Even if acquitted, the very nature of the charges (cheating at gambling tied to political intelligence) casts a shadow over his credibility. If convicted, it would likely bring a formal end to his political career. For a politician once seen as a rising figure in Conservative ranks, the accusations risk permanently marking his record and weakening public trust in those who operate close to power.
Conclusion
The case involving Craig Williams and 14 others represents a high‑stakes clash between traditional political life and modern gambling platforms. While betting remains legal in Wales and the wider UK, this high-profile case demonstrates the critical boundary set by law: gambling must be conducted without privileged insight. As the judicial process continues, the trial will clarify how the law treats those who cross this line. The hearing in July promises to test the robustness of electoral and betting regulations in an era where digital platforms are increasingly entwined with politics.
Image Source: Unsplash
